WHY IS IT DIFFICULT (MOST OF THE TIME) FOR PRESIDENTS TO GET CONGRESS Essay

WHY IS IT DIFFICULT (MOST OF THE TIME) FOR PRESIDENTS TO GET recounting TO PASS THEIR DOMESTIC POLICY AGENDA AND WHAT PRESIDENTS DO TO IMPROVE THEIR ODDS OF SUCCESS - Essay sample chairmans are often confronted by the tension of a needed domestic indemnity change that is treated with the deliberateness of the US legislative system, and must rely on the traditional impact of the sagaciousness of the American voter.One of the obstacles that impede a Presidents ability to change domestic policy is the realization that domestic policy must adhere to the principle of government by the people. While this ideal is as valid today as it was two centuries ago, it has been tempered by the influence of lobbyists and special interest groups. While the power of public opinion can speak through the president, lobbying gives special advantages to vocal vested interests and that negotiations carried on behind closed doors can vacate the.wishes of the whole community in public decision making ( Public Governance 5). Lobbying can influence let out congressional votes that whitethorn be required to enact a piece of jurisprudence. While a President has the power to veto unfavorable domestic policy agitates, lobbyists have the power to kill legislation that may be favorable to the President before it ever gets out of committee. Special interests have undermined the principle of government by the people and influence peddling has presented Presidents with a significant obstacle to their ability to pass domestic legislation.Even without the indefensible influence of consultants, lobbyists, and campaign donations domestic policy is routinely subjected to an increased scrutiny that is based on ideologic concerns. We may hear this characterized as the fight between the left and right, between liberals and conservatives, or the more innate use of the terms free market place and socialism. These opposing philosophical viewpoints have made it difficult to cheat legislation tha t will be favored by one camp, while not being solely unacceptable to the other. Health care has languished in the realm of inaction for decades as the critical need for legislation is outweighed by the fear of creeping socialism. During the early years of the Clinton Presidency, a consensus could not be reached on wellness care as the support broke along ideological lines and compromise could not be reached. accord to Light, Central to a Presidents success is conciliation not challenge cooperation, not conflict (291). While the expound of a health care program can be compromised, ideology does not have the policy-making flexibility that is required to be negotiated. Even conservative European health care policies are typically significantly more liberal than in the US, yet Clintons relatively conservative health care bill became bogged down on the issue of ideological differences, rather than on the content of the legislation (Starr). Domestic policy is often burdened with ideo logy as socially progressive Presidents confront the traditional free market forces of the US political system.Presidential domestic policies are by definition grand and ambitious projects that may be impeded simply because of their complexity and cost. These Presidential projects may bear the Presidents name and will find a significant part of the administrations historical legacy. The New Deal could not have been implemented on any