Twelve Angry Men :: Essays Papers

cardinal Angry homophilepowerIn the story Twelve Angry Men, Reginald Rose shows how making unitarys owndecisions is one very important horizon in life. He also showed that ones decisions should not be impeded by stereotypes. I believe that the jury reached the right verdict because the witnesses were dis be along with each of the evidence.The first reason is that the witnesses were proven to be wrong. For example,there was an el enlighten passing by the old mans window at the time of the murder. Hecouldnt start out been able to hear the murder taking place. The old man was not as much ofa reliable source as he was master keyly vista to be. In addition, the woman that livedacross the avenue from the son did not wear her glasses to bed the night of the murder. She couldnt have been able to know for a fact that the boy was the real murderer. Thewomans attestation is not strong enough to condemn the boy to death. With the two give awaywitnesses having been discredite d, the case against the boy was very weak.The other reason is that the evidence was proven to be not as significant as it was once thought to be. For example, Juror Eight bought a knife exactly like the one used in the murder. The original knife was not as finical or unique as it was portrayed to be in the trial. all person could have bought a knife just like the original one and used it to murder the father. Furthermore, Juror Two said that he thought that the stab wound was too high up for the boy to have inflicted. Someone taller than the boy must have committed the murder. With the forward-looking ideas that are being brought up by the jurors, the boy seems to become a less likely suspect.