.

Friday, February 1, 2019

Analyzing a Police Encounters with a Suspect Essay -- Case Study, Exig

A natural integrity officeholder is required to scram probable cause to stop a fomite, which displace be, but not limited to a occupation encroachment, equipment violation, or hardly suspicious activity. A frisk of the occupants of a fomite is justified if the police officer has reasonable suspicion that the occupants are armed and dangerous. In this essay, I will identify the levels of police encounter involved in the deterrent example study. I will describe the legal requirements needed to justify distributively encounter. I will analyze the facts in the case study against all(prenominal) level of encounter to determine if Officer Smith was justified. In the scenario presented in the case study, Officer Smith is on routine patrol at night when she notices the vehicle in front of her appears to have a low-toned piece of ass aerial, but covered with colored tape. Officer Smith instructs the number one wood to pull the vehicle to the side of the road. In the 19 96, Whren v. United States despite the prevailing circumstances and the personal opinion of the officer whether the occupant of a vehicle is involved in some other illegal activities, a traffic stop is legitimate as long as another ordered officer would have stopped the vehicle for the same traffic violation (The Oyez Project at llT Chicago-Kent College of Law, 2013). The law varies on the broken tail light from state to state. In general, as long as the tail light does not show a bright glaring light and the tail light is operational then it is not a traffic law violation (Leagle, 2013). With that being duly noted, Officer Smith does not have reasonable suspicion to make the initial stop of this vehicle (Carden, 2013). In the case study, as Officer Smith walks to the driver side of the vehicle she recalls that a car fitting the gene... ... 1 June 2015.http//www.georgiacriminaldefense.com/georgiaattemptingtoeludeapoliceofficer.htmlLeagle. (2013). Vicknair v. State. Web. 1 Ju ne 2015.http//www.leagle.com/decision/1983956670SW2d286_1945 levelheaded Information Institute. (n.d.). Exigent circumstances. Web. 1 June 2015.http//www.law.cornell.edu/wex/exigent_circumstancesNational Paralegal College. (2007). Exceptions to the warrant requirement. Web. 1 June 2015.http//nationalparalegal.edu/conlawcrimproc_public/protectionfromsearches&seizures/extowarrantreq.aspNolo. (2013). Your rights during a traffic stop. Web. 1 June 2015.http//www.lawfirms.com/resources/criminal-defense/traffic-tickets/your-rights-during-a-traffic-stop.htmThe Oyez Project at llT Chicago-Kent College of Law. (2013). Whren v. United States. Web. 1 June 2015.http//www.oyez.org/cases/1990-1999/1995/1995_95_5841

No comments:

Post a Comment